On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 14:21 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > The proposed thing is simply DIV_ROUND, but this DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST name > > is just wonky. > > I can't disagree. I even think I argued about it back then, but then > finally gave up. You should have participated in the debate when it was > hot rather than 8 months later :( Yeah, sometimes its hard to keep up with all on lkml, I only noticed it because I ran into some code that used it. Agreed on the other points.
