On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:18:45 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 15:13 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:39:32 +0200, Rudolf Marek wrote: > > > Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > > I use an old patch, and it works fine, was it forgotten? > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Well I think there are more atoms with different TjMax and I became tired to ask > > > Intel again and again. > > > > What's the plan then, never ever support the Atom thermal sensors? > > Seems wrong, TjMax for Core/Core2 is not that clear either, but we > > still do support these. > > > > Lets just expose raw value, and let usespace (or user do the > calculation) > > Just expose the (30 degrees below maximum or so) This doesn't fit in our standard interface. If we want to do this (I'm not sure) we need to define a new interface first. -- Jean Delvare
