On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:35:33 +0200, Andre Prendel wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 09:39:54AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > There are many other references to isDaemon left in the code, which > > suggests that there is room for many additional cleanups. Are you going > > to do this? > > Will fix this in v2 too. What about the two occurrences at the > beginning of parseArgs? I would prefer leaving that to inform the user > about the change of the behaviour. Yes, this is fine with me. We can remove them later, in a year or two. -- Jean Delvare
