Hi Luca,
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 23:37:14 +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote:
> > --- lm-sensors.orig/lib/init.c 2009-02-04 17:52:51.000000000 +0100
> > +++ lm-sensors/lib/init.c 2009-02-04 17:52:51.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -100,6 +106,47 @@ exit_cleanup:
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > +static int config_file_filter(const struct dirent *entry)
> > +{
> > + return entry->d_type == DT_REG
> > + || entry->d_type == DT_LNK
> > + || entry->d_type == DT_FIFO;
> > +}
>
> Hum, why pipes?
No good reason. I checked the list of DT_* constants, excluded the ones
I knew wouldn't work, and kept the remaining ones. I thought that
someone might come up with a specific scenario where using a named pipe
to somehow generate configuration files would make sense. But honestly
I have no idea what such a scenario would be.
So probably it's better to remove DT_FIFO for now. Thanks!
--
Jean Delvare
