Hello,
sensors_error() returns NULL if errnum is not valid. Returning
"Unknown error" in this case, makes output clearer than:
foo: (null)
and prevents error output/logging from segmentation faults.
What do you think?
Andre
Signed-off-by: Andre Prendel <andre_prendel at gmx.de>
---
--- lm-sensors-dev/lib/error.c 2009-01-26 17:43:43.000000000 +0100
+++ my-lm-sensors/lib/error.c 2009-01-28 22:49:53.000000000 +0100
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ void (*sensors_fatal_error) (const char
sensors_default_fatal_error;
static const char *errorlist[] = {
- /* Invalid error code */ NULL,
+ /* Invalid error code */ "Unknown error",
/* SENSORS_ERR_WILDCARDS */ "Wildcard found in chip name",
/* SENSORS_ERR_NO_ENTRY */ "No such subfeature known",
/* SENSORS_ERR_ACCESS_R */ "Can't read",
