Looking for regression in the coretemp driver is barking up the wrong tree. That driver is _reporting_ the higher temperature usage, it's not causing it. It is possible that the reported temperature has shifted up by 15 degrees C between 2.6.24 and 2.6.25 (this can be seen with max temperature changing from 85 degrees C to 100 degrees C - is it the case?) But here the reported difference is 25 degrees C, so that can't be the sole cause. And the differences in reported CPU usage make it pretty clear that there is a real problem and it's not only a matter of temperature reporting. So I seriously doubt this has anything to do with lm-sensors. -- Jean Delvare
