No Alarm when values not within range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Maybe you
> can give them a try and report.

Yes, I could give the patches a try in our environment and report the result.
@Jim: Could you please send me your patches or the source link to them?


The it8718 shows the same behaviour in our environment (no Alarm states given). Is it for the same reason?


Regards
  Bj?rn


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean Delvare [mailto:khali at linux-fr.org] 
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 3:29 PM
> To: Gerhart, Bjoern
> Cc: lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org; Jim Cromie
> Subject: Re:  No Alarm when values not within range
> 
> Hi Bjoern,
> 
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:51:03 +0200, Gerhart, Bjoern wrote:
> > in my company we use lm_sensors a while now. Now we want to
> > update to lm_sensors 3.02 due to a new sensors chip (it8718F) in
> > our latest hardware. I already converted the sensors.conf files
> > into the new syntax. But now I don't get any alarms any more, no
> > matter which sensors chip I use. Here is the output that sensors
> > gives:
> > 
> > [root at devel etc]# sensors
> > pc87366-isa-0fb0
> > Adapter: ISA adapter
> > -12V:       -12.44 V  (min = -13.81 V, max = -10.27 V)
> > +12V:       +12.10 V  (min = +10.71 V, max = +12.70 V)
> > +5V VCC:     +5.24 V  (min =  +4.50 V, max =  +5.70 V)
> > +1.5V:       +1.51 V  (min =  +1.10 V, max =  +1.90 V)
> > +2.5V:       +2.49 V  (min =  +1.90 V, max =  +2.95 V)
> > +1.3V VID:   +1.31 V  (min =  +1.10 V, max =  +1.50 V)
> > +3.3V VSB:   +3.38 V  (min =  +0.00 V, max =  +1.00 V)
> > +3V VBAT:    +2.95 V  (min =  +2.40 V, max =  +2.95 V)
> > CPU Fan:    2909 RPM  (min = 10000 RPM, div = 1)
> > CPU Temp:    +51.0?C  (low  =  +0.0?C, high =  +5.0?C)
> >                       (crit =  +5.0?C)
> > Chip Temp:   +39.0?C  (low  =  +0.0?C, high = +70.0?C)
> >                       (crit = +127.0?C)
> > 
> > The sensors "+3.3V VSB", "CPU Fan" and "CPU Temp" should give
> > an alarm, but they don't. What's the reason for this behaviour?
> 
> The pc87360 driver, which you are using, is the very last one that has
> not yet been converted to the (somewhat new) standard to export alarm
> information. This standard is what lm-sensors 3.x uses. Jim Cromie
> (Cc'd) has been working on it lately and he has patches that should
> implement what you need. I didn't have the time to review 
> these patches
> and probably won't have the time to do so in a near future. Maybe you
> can give them a try and report.
> 
> -- 
> Jean Delvare
> 

-- 
WINCOR NIXDORF International GmbH 
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Paderborn 
Registergericht Paderborn HRB 3507
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Eckard Heidloff (Vorsitzender), Stefan Auerbach, Dr. J?rgen Wunram
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Karl-Heinz Stiller 
Steuernummer: 339/5884/0020 - Ust-ID Nr.: DE812927716 - WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE44477193

Diese E-Mail enth?lt vertrauliche Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese E-Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser E-Mail ist nicht gestattet.

This e-mail may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux