Hi Jean-- OK, I would like a update if you think of anything "interesting"--I'll just keep an eye on the sensors list....... Cheers!! Dean On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote: > Hi Dean, > > On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 07:02:45 -0700, Dean Loros wrote: > > OK Jean--- > > > > ran check---results. > > (...) > > Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done. > > Just press ENTER to continue: > > > > Driver `w83627ehf' (should be inserted): > > Detects correctly: > > * ISA bus, address 0x290 > > Chip `Winbond W83627DHG Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9) > > > > Driver `coretemp' (should be inserted): > > Detects correctly: > > * Chip `Intel Core family thermal sensor' (confidence: 9) > > Good, no longer suggests the lm78. Thanks for testing. > > dean at linux:~/Desktop$ modprobe i2c-dev > > dean at linux:~/Desktop$ i2cdump 1 0x49 > > No size specified (using byte-data access) > > Error: Could not open file `/dev/i2c-1': Permission denied > > Run as root? > > dean at linux:~/Desktop$ sudo i2cdump 1 0x49 > > No size specified (using byte-data access) > > WARNING! This program can confuse your I2C bus, cause data loss and > worse! > > I will probe file /dev/i2c-1, address 0x49, mode byte > > Continue? [Y/n] y > > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f 0123456789abcdef > > 00: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ > > 10: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ > > 20: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ > > 30: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ > > 40: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ > > 50: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ > > 60: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ > > 70: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ > > 80: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ > > 90: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ > > a0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ > > b0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ > > c0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ > > d0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ > > e0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ................ > > f0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 8d 00 00 ff ff ff ff .........?...... > > Hmm, I don't know what it is, but it doesn't look like a hardware > monitoring chip for sure. > > > Left lm78 unloaded--what next? > > I am out of ideas, sorry. > > -- > Jean Delvare > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20080910/9ad66b91/attachment.html
