Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Mark, Andrew, > > On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 00:10:27 -0400, Mark M. Hoffman wrote: >> Hi Linus: >> >> Please pull from: >> git://lm-sensors.org/kernel/mhoffman/hwmon-2.6.git release >> >> You'll get what few patches I've managed to look at in the last few months, >> including a patch to MAINTAINERS which makes it official. I'm sorry I was >> not able to keep up - I should have admitted defeat much sooner. > > I'm sad to see you go (and can only hope that you won't leave the > project entirely). But I would also like to thank you for the good work > you've done. Even if it was short, everything you did is done and > that's something you can be proud of. Especially given the conditions > in which you started in this new role - please forgive me for that. > All I can see really is +1, sad to see you go and thanks for all the work done! >> To all lm-sensors/hwmon developers: please resend/CC patches to Andrew. > > I have a number of hwmon patches in my local kernel tree which I wrote > and that have been reviewed by a trusted developer, or that have been > posted to the lm-sensors list and that I have reviewed. I consider > these ready to go upstream. I plan to gather these into a public tree > and push them to Linus today or tomorrow. In the future, I will > probably have such a tree available to be included in linux-next. > I too don't want to see any patches get dropped, so I'll try to step up a little with regards to reviewing hwmon patches, I would be grateful if you could incorporate any patches Acked by me in said tree. Esp since my git-fu isn't all that good. > Don't get me wrong, I am _not_ volunteering to become the new hwmon > subsystem maintainer. Don't get me wrong either, I will try to step up my reviewing but I am _not_ volunteering to become the new hwmon subsystem maintainer either. I'm just starting a new job and with that combined with that I'm doing a lot of v4l work lately, I simply don't have the time for this. > In the future, I would like to suggest to have 2 hwmon subsystem > maintainers instead of 1. Apparently none of us has the time to do all > the work, but maybe some of us would have the time to do half of it. > This is the path I took for the i2c subsystem, and while the change is > still fairly recent, it seems to be working well enough. > +1 Regards, Hans
