On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:50:04 -0500, Nate Case wrote: > Quick question before I address all of your feedback with patch v2: You > didn't mention these specifically, but I'm assuming you'd also want the > tempX_from_reg_adt7461() functions to use u8 and u16 as well? Hmm, yes, that would probably be more consistent that way; good idea. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare
