Future plans for sensors-detect

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 26 May 2008 12:06:10 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> We already ship a default sensors.conf file which includes arbitrary
> labels for many chips, which may or may not match the user's
> motherboard. This is IMHO plain wrong, I agree with you that
> unconfigured sensors are better than misconfigured sensors. I believe
> that we should strip down sensors.conf.eg to only include labels which
> we know are always correct (e.g. internal voltage labels.) This would
> also make libsensors initialization much faster - for now we waste
> users' time reading long configuration sections for chips they don't
> even have.

I don't have the time to work on this right now, but have created
ticket #2333 so that we don't forget about it.

-- 
Jean Delvare




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux