On Mon, 5 May 2008 23:22:45 +0200 Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On Mon, 5 May 2008 13:56:21 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 2 May 2008 21:55:59 -0700 > > "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong at us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > Minor rework to support the Intel 5400 chipset. > > > > Thanks, I added this to the for-git-hwmon part of the -mm queue. > > > > I haven't heard from Mark for quite some time so soon I might declare him > > absent and I'll go through my hwmon patches with a view to merging them into > > 2.6.26 directly. > > For Mark's status see: > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2008-May/023006.html > > I guess he'll be happy if you merge a couple patches for him. hm, OK. > > > > That queue currently consists of: > > > > hdaps-invert-the-axes-for-hdaps-on-lenovo-r61i-thinkpads.patch > > adt746x-logical-bitwise-confusion-in-set_max_duty_at_crit.patch > > The adt7473:set_max_duty_at_crit() code was originally confusing but > correct. After this patch the code is clear but broken. Is it > considered an improvement? I'll drop it. > (I would have told you before if that patch had been submitted to the > lm-sensors list as it should have, given that it modifies a hardware > monitoring driver... Not to mention that the patch file name doesn't > match the driver file name, just to add to the confusion.) Well, y'know, stuff happens. Stuff like you forgetting to cc that patch's author on this email. > > adt7473-minor-documentation-update.patch > > I reviewed and acked that one, it's ready to go. OK, thanks. > > i5k_amb-support-intel-5400-chipset.patch
