On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, lists at givemefish.com wrote: > However, the sensor values that we see are very strange. They are > all positive values, but they range from 0 to 2500 C. There was some recent discussion about updating some of the drivers to deal with hardware that reports values with 0.001 deg C resolution rather than the more common 0.1 deg C resolution. I am not sure but I think some Intel boards were affected by this. In other words, dividing your reported temperatures by 100 may give you the actual values. > temp1: +71.0?C (high = +50?C, hyst = +0?C) 0.71 C (probably not connected) > temp2: +0.0?C (high = +50?C, hyst = +0?C) > temp3: +0.0?C (high = +0?C, hyst = +2?C) 0 C (probably not connected) > temp4: +1780.0?C (high = +0?C, hyst = +2?C) 17.80 C > temp5: +1860.0?C (high = +0?C, hyst = +2?C) 18.60 C > temp6: +1940.0?C (high = +0?C, hyst = +2?C) 19.40 C > temp7: +720.0?C (high = +8?C, hyst = +0?C) 0.72 C (probably not connected) > temp8: +2520.0?C (high = +66?C, hyst = +2?C) 25.20 C If the machine is sitting in an air-conditioned data center, those values don't seem out of line. > # sensors-detect revision 4171 (2006-09-24 03:37:01 -0700) The latest version of sensors-detect is "5108 (2008-01-22 13:22:47 +0100)"; you may get better results from a newer version of the complete lm-sensors package if possible. Matt Roberds
