Hi Hans, On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:39:27 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Jean Delvare wrote: > > If you have the possibility to test the patch, that would be > > appreciated as well, and less time-consuming than a review. Different > > kernel versions and configurations can make the sysfs tree look a bit > > different. Also, i2c and non-i2c chips have different code paths. I've > > tested as much as I could on my systems, but more testing can't hurt. > > I've just given it a test run on my abituguru machine, works fine. Tomorrow > I'll give it a test run on a FSC machine. OK, thanks. > If you're reasonably sure this patch is ok, I could put it in the Fedora > Rawhide / devel package for some greater exposure, then we can be pretty sure > there will be plenty of testing before we release 3.0.1 . Well, I have no reason to believe that anything is wrong with this patch, as all my testing has been successful. Feel free to apply it to Rawhide if you want. I would like to commit the change soon, the only thing I am waiting for at the moment is Mark's ack, as we had been discussing the matter before, he might want to comment on the approach I took in my patch. -- Jean Delvare
