David Hubbard wrote: > Hi Jim, > > I pulled the w83627ehf.c patch out of patch #5, so patch #5 is > (mostly) unchanged, and then put some of the superio-locks.c changes > in patch #1 to support changes to w83627ehf. So w83627ehf changes are > in my patch #6, where I did the things we have talked about. > > Hi David, thanks so much for pushing forward with this. Sorry for the long delay - I was trying to get facile with git, then I moved, and things (hw) are still in cartons, scattered to the winds, etc, and internet access is rare/inconvenient. I hope to be able to make some progress in Dec, despite travel interruptions, holidays etc. I hope that this slowness is only a little annoying. And now that you've reworked the patches on top of something fresh, that simplifies things greatly :-) and I'll try them out asap. thanks again.
