JAMES SCOTT wrote: > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> > To: James Scott Jr <skoona at verizon.net> > Cc: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl>; lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org > Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 4:49:01 PM > Subject: Re: ABIT IP35 Pro mainboard wrong values from 'sensors' > > On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:53:09 -0400, James Scott Jr wrote: >> Thank you, sensor's output is now correct - coretemp's is wacked. I >> will look into whats happening with coretemp, later. >> >> [jscott at vserv ~]$ sensors >> (...) >> coretemp-isa-0000 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 0: +54?C (high = +100?C) >> >> coretemp-isa-0001 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 1: +51?C (high = +100?C) >> >> coretemp-isa-0002 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 2: +52?C (high = +100?C) >> >> coretemp-isa-0003 >> Adapter: ISA adapter >> Core 3: +50?C (high = +100?C) >> > > The coretemp values actually look alright to me. > > Jean; The abituguru3... sensors output showed 'CPU 40c' and coretemp... details the same CPU around '50c'. So, I have output, it is formatted correctly. However, I believe the reported value is wrong. 10c is a huge difference in values - which is correct? All Cores are running Folding at Home at 100%, so this is a load temp and would not be available if I rebooted to bios to verify. > > I did not find the coretemp-isa-* in the sensors.conf file. Do you know where the computes for this module are setup? James, For some reason later versions of the uguru (and earlier versions too after a BIOS update) seem to report much too low CPU temp values. I guess they are reporting the actual sensor value and adding some offset to compensate for the distance between the sensor on the motherboard and the actual CPU. So I think the core temp readings are correct, esp. for a loaded system. Regards, Hans
