Hey Jean,
Thanks for the quick review. It's starting to show I'm new to this,
isn't it? ;)
Anyway, one question while making the patch for 2.6.23.1:
@@ -553,7 +578,9 @@
|| (err = device_create_file(&pdev->dev,
&dev_attr_temp1_max))
|| (err = device_create_file(&pdev->dev,
- &dev_attr_temp1_max_hyst)))
+ &dev_attr_temp1_max_hyst))
+ || (err = device_create_file(&pdev->dev,
+ &sensor_dev_attr_temp1_alarm.dev_attr)))
goto exit_remove_files;
(E-mail client will most likely mess this up, however, it's also in the
original patch you just reviewed...).
The line "&sensor_dev_attr_temp1_alarm.dev_attr)))" can not fit within
80 characters using the same indentation as the lines above it; it takes
87 characters. However, removing the spaces before it, will still make
it use 81 chars... I can't see any hint about it in the CodingStyles and
removing some tabs will make it look just plain ugly. Any hint how to
format it? Patch against 2.6.23.1 is ready, just waiting to be sure how
to do this correct :p
Anyway,
Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Ivo,
>
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:12:50 +0200, Ivo Manca wrote:
>
>> Jean Delvare wrote:
>>
>>> Your mailer destroyed the patch formatting :( Can you please fix it or
>>> resend the patch as an attachment?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>> Sure. It's attached now, hope that works better.
>>
>
> Yes, it's better but now there's another problem: you based your patch
> on 2.6.22.9, but the sis5595 driver changed a lot in 2.6.23, so I still
> can't apply it. Would you be so kind and send a new patch that would
> apply on top of 2.6.23?
>
> Still, I can review the patch:
>
Ugh. I should have known that, silly me. Anyway, I'll apply my changes
to it. Patch on its way.
>> diff -ubrN linux-2.6.22.9.orig/drivers/hwmon/sis5595.c linux-2.6.22.9/drivers/hwmon/sis5595.c
>> --- linux-2.6.22.9.orig/drivers/hwmon/sis5595.c 2007-10-11 19:38:11.000000000 +0200
>> +++ linux-2.6.22.9/drivers/hwmon/sis5595.c 2007-10-11 19:41:56.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
>> #include <linux/jiffies.h>
>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>> #include <linux/sysfs.h>
>> +#include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
>> #include <asm/io.h>
>>
>>
>> @@ -473,26 +474,47 @@
>> }
>> static DEVICE_ATTR(alarms, S_IRUGO, show_alarms, NULL);
>>
>> +static ssize_t show_alarm(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *da, char *buf)
>>
>
> Remember that line length should never exceed 80 columns.
>
Yup, fixed
>> +{
>> + struct sis5595_data *data = sis5595_update_device(dev);
>> + int nr = to_sensor_dev_attr(da)->index;
>> + return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", (data->alarms >> nr) & 1);
>> +}
>> + static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(in0_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 0);
>> + static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(in1_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 1);
>> + static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(in2_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 2);
>> + static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(in3_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 3);
>> + static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(in4_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 15);
>> + static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(fan1_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 6);
>> + static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(fan2_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 7);
>> + static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 15);
>>
>
> Bad indentation, all these "static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR" lines shouldn't
> be indented.
>
Doh, fixed
>> +
>> static struct attribute *sis5595_attributes[] = {
>> &dev_attr_in0_input.attr,
>> &dev_attr_in0_min.attr,
>> &dev_attr_in0_max.attr,
>> + &sensor_dev_attr_in0_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
>> &dev_attr_in1_input.attr,
>> &dev_attr_in1_min.attr,
>> &dev_attr_in1_max.attr,
>> + &sensor_dev_attr_in1_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
>> &dev_attr_in2_input.attr,
>> &dev_attr_in2_min.attr,
>> &dev_attr_in2_max.attr,
>> + &sensor_dev_attr_in2_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
>> &dev_attr_in3_input.attr,
>> &dev_attr_in3_min.attr,
>> &dev_attr_in3_max.attr,
>> + &sensor_dev_attr_in3_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
>>
>> &dev_attr_fan1_input.attr,
>> &dev_attr_fan1_min.attr,
>> &dev_attr_fan1_div.attr,
>> + &sensor_dev_attr_fan1_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
>> &dev_attr_fan2_input.attr,
>> &dev_attr_fan2_min.attr,
>> &dev_attr_fan2_div.attr,
>> + &sensor_dev_attr_fan2_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
>>
>> &dev_attr_alarms.attr,
>> NULL
>> @@ -506,10 +528,12 @@
>> &dev_attr_in4_input.attr,
>> &dev_attr_in4_min.attr,
>> &dev_attr_in4_max.attr,
>> + &sensor_dev_attr_in4_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
>>
>> &dev_attr_temp1_input.attr,
>> &dev_attr_temp1_max.attr,
>> &dev_attr_temp1_max_hyst.attr,
>> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp1_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
>> NULL
>> };
>>
>> @@ -617,7 +641,9 @@
>> || (err = device_create_file(&new_client->dev,
>> &dev_attr_in4_min))
>> || (err = device_create_file(&new_client->dev,
>> - &dev_attr_in4_max)))
>> + &dev_attr_in4_max))
>> + || (err = device_create_file(&new_client->dev,
>> + &sensor_dev_attr_in4_alarm.dev_attr)))
>> goto exit_remove_files;
>> } else {
>> if ((err = device_create_file(&new_client->dev,
>> @@ -625,7 +651,9 @@
>> || (err = device_create_file(&new_client->dev,
>> &dev_attr_temp1_max))
>> || (err = device_create_file(&new_client->dev,
>> - &dev_attr_temp1_max_hyst)))
>> + &dev_attr_temp1_max_hyst))
>> + || (err = device_create_file(&new_client->dev,
>> + &sensor_dev_attr_temp1_alarm.dev_attr)))
>> goto exit_remove_files;
>> }
>>
>>
>
> Other than that, your patch looks good.
>
>
Thanks,
Ivo
