Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 14:08:46 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Jean Delvare wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> lm-sensors 2.10.4 is 3 months old now, so we should think about >>> releasing 2.10.5. There are no big changes, as expected in a stable >>> branch, but a good load of bugfixes. Proposed schedule: >>> >>> * October 10th: SVN freeze >>> * October 11th-14th: testing >>> * October 15th: release >> <ugh> thats awefully short notice. > > The release date of 2.10.5 has been set to October 16th long ago: > http://www.lm-sensors.org/milestone/2.10.5 > Ah, I never look there, I'll try to take a peek there now and then from now on. >> Alternatively I could test for the readability of SENSORS_FSC***_TEMP1_STATE >> and switch between the code for the old driver and new to be written code for >> the new driver, that might be better as it will also reduce the chance of >> regressions. > > My point exactly :) > Yes, After writing all the stuff snipped above, pressing enter and giving it a second thought, I've come to the conclusion that this way is both the easiest and the best. I'm working on integrating your driver review changes now (so that I can test tomorrow when I have access to the actual hardware) and then I'll start working on a userspace patch. Regards, Hans
