Jean Delvare wrote: > Which version of lm-sensors have you been using for your test? Versions > from 2.9.1 to 2.10.4 (inclusive) are annoyingly shifting channel > numbers by one for bmc. This doesn't explain everything you observed, > but could still have interfered with your diagnostics. So I suggest > that you try either lm-sensors SVN (either the stable branch or the > upcoming 3.0 version): > http://dl.lm-sensors.org/lm-sensors/snapshots/lm-sensors-r4912-20071002.tar.bz2 > http://dl.lm-sensors.org/lm-sensors-3/snapshots/lm-sensors-3-r4914-20071002.tar.bz2 > Jean, thanks for your reply :) I was using 2.10.4, but installed the snapshot now. This is way beyond me, but I got a quite different result now: bmc-isa-0003 Adapter: ISA adapter SCSI-N Volt: +1.33 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) Baseboard 1.5V: +1.98 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) Baseboard 2.5V: +1.89 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) Baseboard 3.3V: +3.06 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) Baseboard 12V: +15.68 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) Baseboard 5V: +4.79 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) Baseboard -12V: -12.11 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +0.00 V) PwrShare Fan 3: 4680 RPM (min = 0 RPM) PwrShare Fan 2: 2520 RPM (min = 0 RPM) PwrShare Fan 1: 2520 RPM (min = 0 RPM) Baseboard Fan 6: 2610 RPM (min = 0 RPM) Baseboard Fan 7: 2730 RPM (min = 0 RPM) Baseboard Fan 8: 2850 RPM (min = 0 RPM) Baseboard Fan 5: 2880 RPM (min = 0 RPM) Baseboard Fan 3: 2730 RPM (min = 0 RPM) Baseboard Fan 4: 2970 RPM (min = 0 RPM) Baseboard Fan 1: 2760 RPM (min = 0 RPM) PwrShare Temp: -12.8?C (high = +0?C, hyst = +0?C) Processor 4 Temp: +6.1?C (high = +0?C, hyst = +0?C) Processor 3 Temp: +2.6?C (high = +0?C, hyst = +0?C) Processor 2 Temp: +2.6?C (high = +0?C, hyst = +0?C) Processor 1 Temp: +2.5?C (high = +0?C, hyst = +0?C) Basebrd PXB Temp: +2.4?C (high = +0?C, hyst = +0?C) Basebrd PCI Temp: +3.0?C (high = +0?C, hyst = +0?C) The voltages looks a little better (Probably still wrong, but I have no idea), but the temperatures were better earlier ;) But that might be another bug in lm-sensors with regard to bmc? Or is that an ipmisensors workaround to get past a lm-sensors bug that is now fixed? I'll have to wait untill I'm back home to see if each sensor now corresponds to the right label in lm-sensors. Thanks for the help :) Regards, Stian
