On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:37:09 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > (...) And I don't much like the > idea of paying for such stuff with an ever-increasing data > footprint, which is how the I2C_CLIENT_INSMOD_*() macros do > such stuff. I don't like these macros either. My plan was to replace them with a per-driver sysfs file that would let users instantiate I2C devices from user-space. Unfortunately I couldn't find the time to actually implement the idea in the past few months. -- Jean Delvare
