> -----Original Message----- > From: lm-sensors-bounces at lm-sensors.org > [mailto:lm-sensors-bounces at lm-sensors.org] On Behalf Of > Sebastian Flothow > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 12:26 PM > To: lm-sensors > Subject: Re: Andigilog aSC7621 on Intel 975XBX2 > - mostly working > > Am 7. Aug 2007 um 03:49 Uhr schrieb George Joseph ((dev)): > > Hmmm. 2.6.16 is definitely not going to work but 2.6.21 > should compile > > fine. In fact, I just tried it again on a freshly untarred 2.6.21.6 > > with no errors. If you tried the older driver, make sure it's > > completely cleaned out. Did the patch apply cleanly? > > Yes, I applied it to a freshly untarred 2.6.21.6 as well. There were > slight offsets, but I think that shouldn't matter: > > |?magrathea linux-2.6.21.6 # patch -p1 < ../asc76xx-2.6.21.patch > | patching file Documentation/hwmon/asc76xx > | patching file drivers/hwmon/asc76xx.c > | patching file drivers/hwmon/Kconfig > | Hunk #1 succeeded at 153 (offset 11 lines). > | patching file drivers/hwmon/Makefile > | Hunk #1 succeeded at 21 (offset 1 line). > > However, I just found that it seems to be caused by my config - if I > use the default config (except for enabling asc76xx, of course), it > compiles fine, yet if I use my usual .config I get the error: > > | CC [M] drivers/hwmon/asc76xx.o > | drivers/hwmon/asc76xx.c: In function 'asc76xx_detect': > | drivers/hwmon/asc76xx.c:1077: error: 'struct asc76xx_chip' has no > member named 'smb_addr' > | make[2]: *** [drivers/hwmon/asc76xx.o] Error 1 > | make[1]: *** [drivers/hwmon] Error 2 > | make: *** [drivers] Error 2 > > This is lines 54 through 64 of drivers/hwmon/asc76xx.c: > > | struct asc76xx_chip { > | char *name; > | enum chips chip_type; > | u8 chip_mask; > | u8 company_reg; > | u8 company_id; > | u8 verstep_reg; > | u8 verstep_id; > | void (*setup) (struct i2c_client * client); > | u8 addresses[4]; > | }; > > No smb_addr there indeed, so it seems one of my config options breaks > your driver. Any idea what I should look for? Just send me your config and I'll take a look. Either that or just start turning off things in your config until it works. > > > > I've got some info on C1E and EIST on the XBX2 specifically at > > http://www.peakin.com/xbx2/index.html > > Thanks, useful page. There's just one thing which seems > unclear to me: > is Tjmax equal to Tcontrol, or is it even higher (kind of a hard > limit)? > I'm not sure that it's clear to anyone. :) Intel's documentation is not clear and conflicts itself and comments made by Intel employees. > > _______________________________________________ > lm-sensors mailing list > lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors >
