Hi Hans, On 7/24/2007, "Hans de Goede" <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> wrote: >Please go here: >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249428 > >For the full story. I think this is caused by this patch: >http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2007-March/019227.html > >Where you not only converted it to a platform driver but also made the >detection more stringent (shouldn't that have been a seperate patch?). You're right, it should have been a separate patch, sorry for the mess :( >I'll be working with the reporter to see whats up, but since you are the >expert your input would be valued very much. I think the easiest would be >if you could join the discussion in Fedora's bugzilla. Setting up an >account is a breeze. I copied the (better) detection code from sensors-detect, thinking that we would know by now if it wasn't working correctly, so I did not expect any regression. But for some reason I missed one of the possible chip IDs for the LM78 in the process. It seems that you already found out. Thanks for fixing my bugs. -- Jean Delvare
