On Jul 25, 2007, at 2:07 AM, Juerg Haefliger wrote: Hi Juerg, > Who knows? There are other things the VIA engineers did that I don't > understand. For example not implementing fan control on the M10000. Well, according to specs on via site, my board should have fancontrol: http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/mainboards/motherboards.jsp? motherboard_id=451 however: /usr/sbin/pwmconfig: There are no pwm-capable sensor modules installed but, I think I do not care, since I don't have any fans connected. I now it pwmconfig did work while I had everything as a module, now I compiled the vt1211 stuff into the kernel. Probably, pwmconfig is using modprobe... > Uh-huh, very nice case! yes, but I had to dig many holes into it, since the heat didn't leave the case. > I'm using the default: > compute temp1 (@ - 73.869) / 0.9528, (@ * 0.9528) + 73.869 > > Even though it's for an Ezra and I don't really trust the readings. I > couldn't get an answer from VIA whether this is the correct > computation for the Nehemiah CPU or not. > > A while ago, somebody wrote to the list about not being happy with the > default and investigating further. Maybe you can search the archives > and contact that person to figure out what he found out. Or there's > always the possibility of attaching a thermal probe to CPU case and > use the thermal resistance values in the Nehemiah datasheet to > correlate driver and voltmeter readings. With that line the temperature readings are too low, at least for my board. I use: compute temp1 (@ - 65) / 0.9686, (@ * 0.9686) + 65 which I used for PD 6000 (Samuel) and now for my new PE 10000 (Nehemiah), both have the same bridge. Regards, c.
