Hi Hans, On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:26:46 +0200, Hans-J?rgen Koch wrote: > Am Dienstag 24 Juli 2007 10:10 schrieb Jean Delvare: > > However, I see that temp4 (which isn't a real temperature channel) is > > not exposed in sysfs. Reading and storing register values you never use > > doesn't seem particularly interesting, so something needs to be done > > here: either drop support for temp4 entirely, or expose the temp4 > > values in sysfs. > > I've got that on my TODO list. I'll soon work on that driver again. I'm still > waiting for that #?$?& NDA-covered datasheet of the LM94. As soon as I've got > that, I need to review all these values anyway because there might be subtle > differences between LM93 and LM94. > For the moment, I'd like to postpone the decision about what to do with temp4. Sure, no problem. -- Jean Delvare
