Jean Delvare wrote: > Now that sensors_get_ignored() is an internal function, we can change > its prototype to suit our needs better. > > * Pass the chip name by address. > * Pass the feature directly rather than its number. > * Switch to a sane convention for the returned value. > * Don't check for errors that can't happen. > > --- > lib/access.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > And once more the patch looks good. Regards, Hans p.s. Let me know when this all lands, then I'll run another round of tests.
