On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:25:56 -0700, Juerg Haefliger wrote: > On 6/29/07, Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:28:18 -0700, Juerg Haefliger wrote: > > > Not sure if option 3) is feasible. Sounds a little bit hacky and I > > > don't know if it's even possible to register a 'bogus' i2c client or > > > if it would break something somewhere that I'm not aware of. > > > > Option 3) has a name: i2c-isa. It took me years to get rid of it, and > > I'm just there now. If you implement something similar again, I'll hate > > you forever ;) So just forget about it, it's not going to happen. > > :-) I knew about i2c-isa and its status. I was not planing on using > it. I don't know, I thought it might be possible to just register the > i2c client somehow without having an actual device behind it. Possible, certainly. Acceptable, no ;-) -- Jean Delvare
