On 6/29/07, Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl> wrote: > Jean Delvare wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I am thinking of removing SENSORS_FEATURE_VRM from the new libsensors. > > A first reason for that is that the newer VRM codes as used in the 2.6 > > kernel are arbitrary numbers and don't match the Intel specification > > numbers as the first ones did. So we may display things like "VRM > > version 1.3" and that's confusing because it doesn't correspond to > > anything real. A second reason is that Rudolf Marek added code to set > > the VRM version automatically depending on the CPU model some times ago > > already, and it works very well, so the users no longer have to care > > about VRM versions. > > > > I would even go as far as switching the vrm attribute of the hwmon > > kernel drivers to read-only... or even remove them entirely. > > > > I think that removing VRM support is a good idea, its called libsensors, so > lets stick to sensors. I second that. ...juerg > > Regards, > > Hans > > > _______________________________________________ > lm-sensors mailing list > lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors >
