All, I looked through a lot of SMSC datasheets the last couple of days with the goal to improve sensor-detect to correctly identify more SMSC Super I/Os. I noticed that some of the chips don't conform to the ISA PNP standard with the device ID register living at a different address (0x0d instead of 0x20). In order to correctly identify those chips, a somewhat ugly (and totally SMSC specific) hack would be necessary. Something like reading from both addresses and then using the value from 0x0d for some of the SMSC chips. I wonder how much value this adds given that none of these Super IOs have HW monitoring capabilities? The only benefit I can see is that the chip is correctly identified and we can flag it as not being a sensor and thus users won't bug us for adding support. Any thoughts, comments, ideas? Thanks ...juerg
