[PATCH] lm-sensors: add dme1737 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Juerg,

On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:43:39 -0700, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
> > >       { "pwm2", "pwm2", 0, "fan2_pwm" },
> > >       { "pwm3", "pwm3", 0, "fan3_pwm" },
> > >       { "pwm4", "pwm4", 0, "fan4_pwm" },
> > > +     { "pwm5", "pwm5", 0, "fan5_pwm" },
> > > +     { "pwm6", "pwm6", 0, "fan6_pwm" },
> > >       { "pwm1_enable", "pwm1_enable", 0, "fan1_pwm_enable" },
> > >       { "pwm2_enable", "pwm2_enable", 0, "fan2_pwm_enable" },
> > >       { "pwm3_enable", "pwm3_enable", 0, "fan3_pwm_enable" },
> > >       { "pwm4_enable", "pwm4_enable", 0, "fan4_pwm_enable" },
> > > +     { "pwm5_enable", "pwm5_enable", 0, "fan5_pwm_enable" },
> > > +     { "pwm6_enable", "pwm6_enable", 0, "fan6_pwm_enable" },
> > >       { NULL, NULL }
> > >  };
> > >
> >
> > You shouldn't need this, the alternative names were only in use for a
> > short range of early 2.6 kernels, and your driver will never be
> > backported to these kernels.
> 
> If I don't have these lines I get 'Can't get pmw5 data' and 'Can't get
> pwm6 data' errors. Isn't this the right fix?

Ah, you're right, there was a bug in libsensors in the way the pwm
symbol names were translated. I fixed it diffrently in SVN, so that it
will work for pwm7, pwm8 etc. too:
http://www.lm-sensors.org/changeset?new=lm-sensors%2Ftrunk%2Flib%2Fproc.c%404354&old=lm-sensors%2Ftrunk%2Flib%2Fproc.c%404287
Please confirm it works for you.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux