On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:58:50 -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:30:30PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > In general, alarm flags work as intended and applications can use them. > > Only the W83781D causes trouble, and it's just bad luck that this is > > the chip you are using. So for the W83781D, yes, comparing the readings > > with the limit values is better. > > What luck. Should it be considered a bug that W83781D has alarm > behavior inconsistent with the rest of the sensors? I'd say so, yes. -- Jean Delvare
