On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:33:49 -0600, David Hubbard wrote:
> Now, I'm not the most knowledgeable one about the I2C subsystem, but I
> believe that w83627ehf_driver is redeclared a little later with this:
>
> static struct i2c_driver w83627ehf_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "w83627ehf",
> },
> .attach_adapter = w83627ehf_detect,
> .detach_client = w83627ehf_detach_client,
> };
>
>
> Jean mentioned that it might be a good idea to define .name at
> runtime, depending on whether a w83627ehf or a w83627dhg was detected.
No, the name which depends on the device is the (surprise!) device
name, not the driver name. As the w83627ehf driver currently is based
on i2c-isa, this is the name field of an i2c_client structure. The
driver name must match the source file name, so it's not supposed to
change.
--
Jean Delvare
