[RFC] Improved sensors-detect output

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:45:15PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:

> I am considering "No" as a replacement, it's short and neutral. 

I'm sorry, because I am not a programmer and can't help in that area.  But
as a user it has struck me before that "Failed!" is kind of unnecessarily
emphatic and alarming, like there is something "Wrong!".

I agree with something like a simple "No" (without the exclamation point) to
replace "Failed!".

Michael

-- 

San Francisco, CA




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux