lm-sensors wrote:
> #2076: [ patch 0/3 ] hwmon/pc87360 maintainership, object shrink
> using combo callback
> --------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
> Reporter: ruik | Owner: somebody
> Type: task | Status: closed
> Priority: major | Component: kernel
> Version: CVS/SVN | Resolution: invalid
> Keywords: |
> --------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
> Changes (by ruik):
>
> * status: new => closed
> * resolution: => invalid
>
>
1 - should I have been CCd on this ticket update ?
seems that
2 - I infer that 'invalid' means doesnt apply cleanly any longer.
If not, whats the real reason ?
If so, is it practical to have that as a resolution ?
and presuming I'll fix them up, should I (try to) :
update the ticket ? open new one ? just resend to list ?
3 - who is *ruik* ?
Is it Rudolf Marek ?
not that it matters, its just nice to know..
