On 8/4/06, Yani Ioannou <yani.ioannou at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jean, > > On 8/4/06, Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote: > > We can obviously apply this, it's not very intrusive ;) However, may I > > ask why you didn't simply keep the "bmc" prefix? You would have won > > compatibility with a few previous releases of lm_sensors, and the name > > change might also confuse the users. Actually just letting the name attribute return "bmc" seems to allow ipmisensors to work with lm-sensors as is (with the exception of sensors-detect as mentioned before). So I think thats the way I'll go for now. Yani
