Hi Jean: * Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> [2006-08-03 17:40:45 +0200]: > > Try our latest default configuration file: > > http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk/etc/sensors.conf.eg > > > > If that works, then the problem is definitely the configuration file you > > created. If not... Please tell us with which versions of flex and bison > > you built lm_sensors. > > > > Note that you can use the "-c" option of "sensors" to select a > > configuration file. This should help you test different files. > > > > -- I tried the newest config file, still flex scanner jammed, working on > > getting a copy to send to you. > > > > -- using flex version 2.5.4 > > -- using bison version 1.875c > > I just tried this combination but was unable to reproduce the problem. > > Can you try removing the following line from lib/conf-lex.l: > > %option nodefault > > As I understand it, it should cause libsensors to output anything it > doesn't understand in the config file to stdout. Maybe that will > provide some hint. Other than that, I don't know what to suggest. I have been watching this thread closely, even though I haven't spoken up until now. Version 2.5.4 of flex is current[1] (same as mine), version 1.875c of bison is ancient (I have 2.0). OTOH, I'm pretty sure that's irrelevant to this problem because the "flex scanner jammed" message happens prior to the parser (from bison) receiving the token from flex. I.e. we both have the same version of flex; AFAICT that's all that matters. As for the %option nodefault... I think there is some bad interaction between that one and %option yylineno. Some time ago I played with getting rid of %option yylineno (and keeping track of line numbers with explicit rules) as a performance optimization. As soon as I turned off the yylineno option, flex started complaining about the nodefault option being specified even though the default rule was still in use. But those two options should be unrelated... I haven't figured it out yet. I'm not sure how helpful any of this is for the problem at hand... sorry. Regards, [1] Well, not really. Flex has been updated a lot since 2.5.4, but that all happened outside of the GNU project and I don't think any distro ships the newer non-GNU flex versions. If you look on ftp.gnu.org, they claim the latest is 2.5.4. -- Mark M. Hoffman mhoffman at lightlink.com
