Hi Jean, Rudolf, On 6/20/06, Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote: > This initialization doesn't make much sense, it is arbitrary and the > value will be overwritten on first update anyway. What's the purpose? The value can't be zero, so I initialized it to 1. This is also a holdover from emulating 0 (disabled). Let's take it out and test it that way. What do you think, Rudolf? David
