Quoting myself: > I think it is about time to have a dedicated list for i2c, instead of > having a single list for hardware monitoring (sensors) and i2c. There > are more and more non-sensors users for the i2c bus (for example > media/video adapters, RTC chips) and more different connectivities for > sensors (for example SPI) so having a single list makes less and less > sense. The balance being in favor of a separate list for i2c by 3 to 0, let's do that. This raises the question of what w1 will become. If i2c has a seperate list, keeping w1 in the lm-sensors list would be confusing. Evgeniy, I think you should have a separate list for w1, like we plan to do for i2c. We can host the list for you on lm-sensors.org's mailman if you want, or if you prefer you can move to a different place. Your call, just let us know. -- Jean Delvare
