Hi Alex,
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 04:08:36PM +0200, Alexander Krause wrote:
> >static void detect_acb_base_addresses(int *acb1, int* acb2)
> >{
> > unsigned char h1 = 0;
> > unsigned char l1 = 0;
> > unsigned char h2 = 0;
> > unsigned char l2 = 0;
> >
> > /* Select ACB1 (LDN 5) */
> > outb(0x07,CFG_INDEX);
> > outb(0x05,CFG_DATA);
> > outb(0x60,CFG_INDEX);
> > h1 = inb(CFG_DATA);
> > outb(0x61,CFG_INDEX);
> > l1 = inb(CFG_DATA);
> >
> > /* ACB2 (LDN 6) */
> > outb(0x07,CFG_INDEX);
> > outb(0x06,CFG_DATA);
> > outb(0x60,CFG_INDEX);
> > h2 = inb(CFG_DATA);
> > outb(0x61,CFG_INDEX);
> > l2 = inb(CFG_DATA);
> > *acb1 = (h1 << 8) | l1;
> > *acb2 = (h2 << 8) | l2;
> > DEBUG(1,printk("ACB1 at %x, ACB2 at %x",*acb1,*acb2));
> >}
> is there any patch against the last kernel containing this function?
> Well, i would write one if not and i could test it on my WRAP board (sc1100
> processor).
Not currently, but I will have one ready in roughly a week. The delay is
because I am actually modifying an older version suitable for the 2.4
kernel. On my WRAP platform I don't yet have a suitable 2.6 kernel for
testing it. If you want a patch urgently to try out, I can perhaps make
one, but I'll have to rely on you to test it.
Regards,
Thomas
