On 2006-03-16, Hans de Goede wrote: > > We will go with individual alarm files, as I had been proposing. I will > > not have the time to submit a new documentation patch before next week, > > but basically it's just what my previous patch was saying. Follow the > > same naming scheme for beep, alarm_mask and shutdown (the later two > > being only used by your driver AFAIK.) > > Ok, got a link handy to the patch you're talking about? Otherwise I'll > scim the archives. This post: http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2006-March/015502.html Or you can get the patch file directly from here: http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/i2c/linux-2.6/hwmon-sysfs-interface-individual-alarm-files.patch -- Jean Delvare