Hi. On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 18:53 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Do you think this is an acceptable compromise? > No, it's not. [...] Good point, I'll remove that feature. > > Well, it seems that the backport is done then. I'll test the driver a > > bit more locally. If I don't find any further problems/bugs, I'll send > > it to the list during the next days. > OK, great. The only issue that seems to be open now is to get changing the different values right. Currently the result of a write to the /proc files isn't exactly what one would expect :) > As this driver is not part of our packages, there's not much we can do. > You may try proposing your patch to Marcelo Tosatti for inclusion into > 2.4 mainline, but changes are he will reject it. He is being very > conservative now, he even didn't accept my latest documentation updates > and typo fixes. Hmm, ok. > Other than that, all you can do is publish your fix as a patch > somewhere on the web where people interested in it are likely to find > it. I have no idea myself where such a place would be. No problem, I'll offer the changes on my server. Bye, Mike
