On Sat, Dec 03, 2005, Jean Delvare wrote: > I'll go undefine these experimental IDs soon anyway, as the concept is > broken IMHO. If driver authors don't use the ID, they can set it to 0. > If they do use it, they better register it soon so as to avoid > collisions with other drivers which haven't been merged either. I believe no one actually uses I2C ids in drivers/media/. Is it documented somewhere that they should be set to 0 when unused? I believe most people set them to experimental ids because they fear getting conflicts and malfunctionings when they leave them at 0. Johannes
