Hello: * Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh at debian.org> [2005-11-23 23:57:57 -0200]: > On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Jean Delvare wrote: > > abandonned. I wish I had an SMBus 2.0 system myself to experiment with, > > but unfortunately even the most recent systems I have don't support > > SMBus 2.0. > > Well, I suppose this means there is a device in that bus doing it, because I Correct. > have the same SMBus controller and there is no such 0x61 (neither is there a > 0x64) device in the scan report. If a device supports SMBus 2.0, it will answer on 0x61. In fact, there may be *multiple* devices answering on 0x61... which is perfectly normal, until the host assigns them all individual addresses. But as was mentioned, that is not supported in Linux at the moment. Regards, -- Mark M. Hoffman mhoffman at lightlink.com
