Hello, I've took the patch series proposed by Nathan Lutchansky [1] in august, applied some of the suggestions which were emerged from its discussion and added a little improvement. The original patches are available at [2]. I added some more code in order to let an adapter specify which of its addresses should be probed for which driver. This is useful for platform devices and, probably, video cards. quoting Nathan.. "Currently, when a new i2c bus needs to be probed, the i2c subsystem calls the attach_adapter callback for each loaded i2c client driver, which must call the i2c_probe function with a list of addresses to be probed and another callback for reporting detected devices: static int foo_attach_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter) { if (!(adapter->class & I2C_CLASS_HWMON)) return 0; return i2c_probe(adapter, &addr_data, foo_detect); } Virtually every i2c client driver uses exactly the same code, so there's little point in requiring them all to implement this callback. The first patch in this series adds two new fields to the i2c_driver structure, `address_data' and `detect_client', and if they are set by the driver, the i2c core will automatically call i2c_probe using those fields as the second and third argument. If the `class' field of the i2c_driver structure is set, it will be compared with the adapter class first. Patches 2 and 3 add these fields to the i2c_driver initializer in the i2c hwmon and misc i2c chip drivers and remove the corresponding attach_adapter callbacks." [1] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2005-August/013320.html [2] http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2005-August/013321.html http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2005-August/013322.html http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2005-August/013323.html -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Turin, Italy http://www.towertech.it