Hi Rudolf, On 2005-11-01, Rudolf Marek wrote: > VID "something special" > 1 1 1 1 1.30V > 1 1 1 0 1.35V > 0 0 0 0 2.05V This looks like standard VRM 8.4 to me, nothing special. > We need to define 2 new VIDs one is something called > > IMVP-II (I dont know anything about -I and -III => will call it 1718 > > and the that really strange samuel 2 VID codding. => will call it 670 > > Ideas? Questions? > If not I will develop the patch. Sure, add new VRM-like values if needed. We might end up defining constant for these so that the number do not look like magic. While you're at it, I think we should do some changes to vid_from_reg: I think VRM 8.2 was the default for historical reasons, but it's not safe. We shouldn't have no default. 8.2 should be handled explicitely as other values are. Any non-zero, non-handled value should trigger a debug log message. Any non-handled value should result in 0 being returned. OK? Thanks, -- Jean Delvare
