On Tue, 25 Oct 2005, Eric Pascal wrote: > I'd like to help you but I'm really not an expert in hardware > programming or in motherboard chipsets, I have just been able to > keep this patch alive for 1 year but apparently it's not enough. > Could you tell me in what this patch is 100% different from what is > in lm-sensors and I could fix it? It would be a pity that these > working modifications would be lost forever. The sysfs interface to userland needs to be changed, and it won't map 1:1 to your hardware. Here is the LM85 interface (as per 2.6.13.3): alarms cpu0_vid vrm fan#_input fan#_min in#_input in#_max in#_min pwm# pwm#_auto_channels pwm#_auto_pwm_freq pwm#_auto_pwm_min pwm#_auto_pwm_minctl pwm#_enable temp#_auto_temp_crit temp#_auto_temp_max temp#_auto_temp_min temp#_auto_temp_off temp#_input temp#_max temp#_min Where # is a number that varies with the number of channels. Some of these entries are RW, others are RO, and some are automatically updated if others are changed. My version of LM85 adds the following entries: auto_acoustics_enhancement auto_acoustics_enhancement_pwm# (adm1027/adt7463) auto_acoustics_enhancement_temp# (lm85b/c, emc6d100/101/102) The implementation of auto_acoustics_enhancement* is up do discursion, I don't like the current one I took as a first approach, which I described in a post to this ML a few weeks ago. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh
