For what its worth I get the same problem on a new machine I just put together (ironically enough so I could test ipmi_sensors on a more modern BMC - using the Tyan SMDC add-on). The motherboard is a Tyan 2882-D (an updated 2882) and I get: w83781d 1-0028: Duplicate addresses 0x48 for subclients. when trying to use w83781d. sensors-detect says I should be able to access the chip through the ISA bus too, but loading i2c-isa and w83781d no chip seems to be detected. The motherboard has two smbus interfaces, one an Smbus 2.0 interface through i2c_amd8111 and i2c_amd756. Nothing seems to be using i2c_amd8111 though. An adm1027 is also detected and works fine. Thanks, Yani On 6/13/05, Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote: > Hi Sukhdeep, > > > The Motherbowrd is from VIAPRO, it's similar to kt400. > > VIA Pro / KT400 is the name of the South Bridge. This doesn't tell me > the motherboard itself is. Have you no idea? dmidecode [1] may help. > > [1] http://www.nongnu.org/dmidecode/ > > > Client found at address 0x29 > > (...) > > Probing for `Winbond W83782D'... Success! > > (confidence 8, driver `w83781d'), other addresses: 0x48 0x49 > > (...) > > Client found at address 0x2d > > (...) > > Probing for `Winbond W83782D'... Success! > > (confidence 8, driver `w83781d'), other addresses: 0x48 0x49 > > Wow. So it does actually find *two* W83782D chips, which share the same > subclient addresses. This is no good. > > Can you please provide the output of the following commands: > i2cdump -y 0 0x29 > i2cdump -y 0 0x2d > > (I assume this is on i2c bus 0; if not, put the correct ID.) > > > Probing for `Winbond W83697HF Super IO Sensors' > > Success... but not activated > > And the Super-I/O is there. I suspect that the W83697F has the same ID, > so we cannot differenciate, but the W83697F has no hardware monitoring > logical device - which would explain why it is listed as 'not activated" > here. > > So... the correct modprobe line for you would be: > > modprobe w83781d force_subclient=0,0x29,0x4a,0x4b > > Try it :) > > -- > Jean Delvare > > _______________________________________________ > lm-sensors mailing list > lm-sensors at lm-sensors.org > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors >
