Holger Oehm wrote: > On Friday 20 May 2005 10:18, Jean Delvare wrote: > >>Hallo Holger, >> >> >>>>Unfortunately not, although the need exists and some tries were made. >>> >>>Hmm, they failed? Why? Is it just that collecting the data would mean >>>a *lot* of work? Or would you say it simply cant be done? >>>What if someone would volunteer to give it a try? (Probably one of my >>>worst ideas lately ;-) >> >>It can be done. The point was to build a system which would require next >>to zero maintenance time: a web interface, where users could easily add >>their own configuration files (wiki-like, in a way). But setting this up >>requires a time and energy investment, which just didn't happen. > > > Hi Jean, > > Well, I invested some energy and time, and here is a URL: > > http://sites.inka.de/penti/cgi-bin/lmsensor.pl > > It is still a prototype and regrettably uploading sensor.confs does not work > on that webserver. (It did work at home, I suspect that the CGI.pm and/or > perl are too old on that machine). > > The stuff is just one perl script using CGI.pm and a C executable I compiled with some > internals of the latest sensors lib (I wanted to make sure configs are valid when > I store them). It stores uploaded files striped down (only valid tags, no comments) and > compressed. > I am thinking about how to add the possibility to sign configurations (like someone > who uses one of the configs and it works for him, he could sign it somehow (pgp?)). > > Could you spare the time to have a look at it? I would appreciate your feedback very > much! > > Best regards, > Holger. > looks like a good start to me!
