Hi Sebastian, > > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2005-June/012597.html > > > > This will also have the advantage that you'll see how the new sysfs > > callbacks can be written, and this should hopefully make your code > > much more simple. > > Ok, is this patch against 2.6.12-rc5? Because it fails to apply. It was against Greg's current i2c tree as I wrote it. The easier for you would be to start from 2.6.12-rc6 + this patch: http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/i2c/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.12-rc6-i2c.patch.gz Or the latest -mm, at your option (but be aware that linux-2.6.12-rc6-mm1 has a few known issues WRT hardware monitoring.) Both include the all the latest it87 patches. > it87: Found IT8705F chip at 0x290, revision 3 Hey, lucky you. I'd like to have this one, but unfortunately mine is revision 2 only. So, yours implements the newer auto-pwm model, while mine implements the old one. You might even get VID readings if your chip was wired for this. -- Jean Delvare
