On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 08:21:39AM +1000, Grant Coady wrote: > On Wed, 11 May 2005 19:54:29 +0200, Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote: > > >> This small patch changes two drivers, adm1025 and adm1026, to > >> report vid as cpu0_vid sysfs name as used by the other drivers. > >> > >> Added duplicated names and six month warning for old names to > >> be removed as requested. Compile tested. > > > >The patch is fine but doesn't apply to my tree. Could you possibly > >regenerate it against 2.6.12-rc4? > > Yes, but no point including Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > patch as that file way behind in 2.6.12-rc4 compared to rc3-mm3 What do you mean? Who knows if those changes will make it into a later kernel. Patching against 2.6.12-rc4 allows me to accept the patch, which will put it into the -mm tree. Please do that. thanks, greg k-h
