On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:59:32PM -0400, Yani Ioannou wrote: > On further reflection, how about I work off this patch for now and for > each of the derived attributes submit a separate patch implementing > the callbacks, etc for that attribute along with an example patch > showing how it can be used to benefit some existing code (these > already exist for device and class attributes, so I'll resubmit those > examples). > > This way we can be sure that we aren't changing any of the derived > attributes needlessly, and it presents a better view of exactly what > changes I'm making to others I suppose :-). That sounds great, and is what I was trying to get at. > We should probably document this change somehow in the sysfs > documentation at some point too. Yeah, documentation, what a concept... :) thanks, greg k-h
